Alerting Guidelines
note
Tetrate Service Bridge collects a large number of metrics and the relationship between those, and the threshold limits that you set will differ from environment to environment. This document outlines the generic alerting guidelines rather than providing an exhaustive list of alert configurations and thresholds, since these will differ between different environments with different workload configurations.
TSB Operational Status
TSB Availability
The rate of successful requests to TSB API. This is an extremely user-visible signal and should be treated as such.
Establish the THRESHOLD
value from historical metric data captured within your
environment used as a baseline. A reasonable value for a first iteration would
be 0.99
.
Example PromQL expression:
sum(
rate(
grpc_server_handled_total{
component="tsb",
grpc_code="OK",
grpc_type="unary",
grpc_method!="SendAuditLog"
}[1m]
)
) BY (grpc_method) / sum(
rate(
grpc_server_handled_total{
component="tsb",
grpc_type="unary",
grpc_method!="SendAuditLog"
}[1m]
)
) BY (grpc_method) < THRESHOLD
TSB Request Latency
TSB gRPC API request latency metrics are intentionally not emitted due to high metric cardinality.
TSB Request Traffic
The raw rate of requests to TSB API. The monitoring value comes principally from detecting outliers and unexpected behaviour, e.g. an unexpectedly high or low request rate. To establish reasonable thresholds, it is vital to have a history of metrics data to gauge the baseline.
Example PromQL expression:
sum(
rate(
grpc_server_handled_total{
component="tsb",
grpc_type="unary",
grpc_method!="SendAuditLog"}[1m]
)
) BY (grpc_method) < THRESHOLD
# or > THRESHOLD
TSB Absent Metrics
TSB talks to its persistent backend even without constant external load. An absence of requests reliably indicates an issue with TSB metrics collection, and should be treated as a high-priority incident as the lack of metrics means the loss of visibility into TSB's status.
Example PromQL expression:
sum(rate(persistence_operation[10m])) == 0
Persistent Backend Availability
Persistent backend availability from TSB with no insight into the internal Postgres operations.
TSB stores all of its state in the persistent backend and as such, its operational status (availability, latency, throughput etc.) is tightly coupled with the status of the persistent backend. TSB records the metrics for persistent backend operations that may be used as a signal to alert on.
It is important to note that any degradation in persistent backend operations will inevitably lead to overall TSB degradation, be it availability, latency or throughput. This means that alerting on persistent backend status may be redundant and the oncall person will receive two pages instead of one whenever there is a problem with Postgres that requires attention. However, such a signal still has significant value in providing important context to decrease the time to triage the issue and address the root cause/escalate.
note
Treatment of "resource not found" errors: small number of "not found" responses
are normal because TSB, for the purposes of optimisation, often uses Get
queries instead of Exists
in order to determine the resource existence.
However, a large rate of "not found" (404-like) responses likely indicates an
issue with the persistent backend setup.
Example PromQL expressions:
- Queries:
1 - (
sum(
rate(
persistence_operation{
error!="", error!="resource not found"
}[1m]
)
) / sum(
rate(persistence_operation[1m])
) OR on() vector(0)
) < THRESHOLD
- Too many "resource not found" queries:
(
sum(
rate(persistence_operation{error="resource not found"}[1m])
) OR on() vector(0) / sum(
rate(persistence_operation[1m])
)
) > THRESHOLD # e.g. 0.50
- Transactions:
sum(
rate(persistence_transaction{error=""}[1m])
) / sum(
rate(persistence_transaction[1m])
) < THRESHOLD
Persistent Backend Latency
The latency of persistent backend operations as recorded by the persistent backend client (TSB). This latency effectively translates to user-seen latency and as such is a vital signal.
The THRESHOLD
value should be established from a historical metrics data used
as a baseline. A sensible value for a first iteration would be 300ms
99th
percentile latency.
Example PromQL expressions:
- Queries
histogram_quantile(
0.99,
sum(rate(persistence_operation_duration_bucket[1m])) by (le, method)
) > THRESHOLD
- Transactions:
histogram_quantile(
0.99,
sum(rate(persistence_transaction_duration_bucket[1m])) by (le)
) > THRESHOLD
XCP Operational Status
Last Management Plane Sync
The max time elapsed since XCP Edge last synced with the management plane (XCP central)
for each registered cluster. This indicates how stale the configuration received from the
management plane is in a given cluster. A reasonable first iteration threshold
here is 30
(seconds).
Example PromQL expression:
time() - min(
xcp_central_last_config_propagation_event_timestamp_ms{edge!=""} / 1000
) by (edge, status) > THRESHOLD
XCP Edge Saturation
TSB Control Plane components are mostly CPU-constrained. Thus, the CPU utilisation serves as an important signal and should be alerted on. Keep in mind when choosing the alert THRESHOLDs that not only cloud providers tend to overprovision CPU, but even hyperthreading may have negative effects on Linux scheduler efficiency and lead to increased latencies/errors even at <~80% CPU utilisation.
Istio Operational Status
NB: this is not an exhaustive list of valuable signals that Istio Data Plane provides. For more in-depth information please refer to:
- https://istio.io/latest/docs/examples/microservices-istio/logs-istio/
- https://istio.io/latest/docs/ops/best-practices/observability/
- https://istio.io/latest/docs/concepts/observability/
This document describes the absolute bare minimum alerting setup for Istio service mesh.
Proxy Convergence Time
Delay in seconds between config change and a proxy receiving all required configuration. This is another part of configuration propagation latency.
Example PromQL expression:
histogram_quantile(
0.99,
sum(
rate(
pilot_proxy_convergence_time_bucket{
cluster_name="$cluster"
}[1m]
)
) by (le)
) > THRESHOLD
Istiod Error Rate
The error rate of various Istiod operations. To establish correct thresholds, it is important to have the history of metrics data to gauge the baseline.
Example PromQL queries:
- Write Timeouts:
sum(
rate(pilot_xds_write_timeout{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
) > THRESHOLD
- Internal Errors:
sum(
rate(pilot_total_xds_internal_errors{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
) > THRESHOLD
- Config Rejections:
sum(
rate(pilot_total_xds_rejects{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
) > THRESHOLD
- Write Timeouts:
sum(
rate(pilot_xds_write_timeout{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
) > THRESHOLD
Configuration Validation
The success rate of Istio configuration validation requests. Elevated errors indicate that the Istio configuration generated by XCP Edge is not valid and this should be urgently addressed.
Example PromQL expression:
sum(
rate(galley_validation_passed{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
) / (
sum(
rate(galley_validation_passed{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
) + sum(
rate(galley_validation_failed{cluster_name="$cluster"}[1m])
)
) < THRESHOLD
Capacity Planning and Resource Saturation
TSB, XCP Central/Edge, OAP/Zipkin Saturation
TSB components are mostly CPU-constrained in addition to being constrained by OAP/Zipkin memory utilisation depending on the amount of telemetry/traces they collect. Thus, the CPU utilisation serves as an important signal and should be alerted on. Even though it is not a direct symptom of an issue affecting users, saturation provides a valuable signal that the system is underprovisioned/oversaturated before it results in user impact.
Keep in mind when choosing the alert THRESHOLDs
that not only cloud providers
tend to overprovision CPU, but even hyperthreading may have negative effects on
Linux scheduler efficiency and lead to increased latencies/errors even at <~80%
CPU utilisation.